As for the tenant's boyfriend, even criminals leave their homes to go to work...Don't let them out of the lease.

Are there any sites where I can check their criminal and evictions if any?

It is totally ridiculous that Indiana has taken no criminal action against the many people involved in this.

(C) Criminal history is clean(D) Provide references and call the references2.

Landlord tenant law has its own version of ambulance chasers that would love nothing more than to make a few bucks off of a landlord that tried to read further into a tenants life than just criminal history, verifiable income, credit score, and rental history.Logically, we would all like to be able to make decisions based on personality differences, family size, possible income drops, or whatever gut feeling we have.

You just didn't get caught.And god help you if you do it to a borrower in financial distress or if you do it in a state that prohibits equity skimming, requires licensure or registration, or other nefarious acts against homeowners. the crew I rescued in Oregon who did about 30 of these got in major trouble when they started to fail .. under capitalized drank the kool aid.. wrap un qualified buyers into the houses.. original sellers getting NOD's and then filing complaints with the AG etc.. it broke them end of the day they did not get criminally charged ..

P.S: All the applicants have good credit scores, 3x income, and no criminal or eviction history.

And they can not buy a foreclosure for their personal benefit.As to your comment "I'm spending this week learning about foreclosure investing" the first thing to study is RCW 61.34.030 Criminal penalty.make sure you understand what that means.

If your lease agreement doesn't prohibit driving too fast in the residential area of the unit, you need to have a landlord attorney in your state look at the lease you're using, because driving too fast in a residential area may be a civil or criminal infraction or may even rise to the level of endangering the lives of others (neighbors).

Essentially, the criminal act of the third party was against you (more so than the tenant), because payment had been delivered to you and thus was "in your possession".