@Jay KaltenbachJust so there is not a misunderstanding, the meeting is not a "meet up" in the sense that it is used on the BP site which is a meeting of folks all of whom are active on BP.  

It's a real dilemma and I think there's misunderstanding from the players who don't know California RE. 

Thanks for the responses, but i think that you guys are misunderstanding.

I concede that maybe there was a misunderstanding, but my wife and I need a phase I to make an educated purchase, so we will pay for it out of our own pockets. 

I've attempted to reach him multiple times on multiple platforms with no response.I realize it's been a crazy business environment for everyone this year, so hopefully this is a big misunderstanding and Michael can clear it up.

For the entire 5 months there have been half truths and misinformation and misunderstandings on my part.

I have to be misunderstanding your post because you surely aren't suggesting that investors skip negotiation. 

@Errol St Marthe - I think there may be a  misunderstanding.

Can anyone explain both of these in a little bit of detail to help clarify any misunderstandings.

We can talk about problems, we can even discuss the fact there are solutions, but in touting solutions, we are held to a higher standard that the average person opining something that may or may not be correct.To provide "complete details" might take days of work to transfer pages and pages of material, and there is always the danger that someone could misunderstand or misjudge the importance of some point, and end up in trouble and then blame me for their problem in the form of a lawsuit or even a defense with regulators.