
3 April 2017 | 42 replies
So, apparently it is NOT all in good fun to some at least (not implying that's you Brent) ... this party just turned into a wake, so drink up indeed.

5 October 2016 | 6 replies
Related party transactions are very thorny.

4 October 2016 | 0 replies
When it's time to sell, doing the rehab/cleanup, etc.. is a pain when you are depending on some third party to do it, and monitor the work.#2 Passive vs. active.

13 October 2016 | 17 replies
The reality is it would halt real estate transaction volume, causing a stagnant market which both party's constituents don't want.Try not to victimize yourself here...

6 October 2016 | 4 replies
What most people don't seem to get is that the small percentage 3-7% in most cases gets severely chopped up and goes to many different parties or expenses.

30 March 2018 | 12 replies
If they do and they're the kind of place that actually sells to 3rd parties then reach out and make sure they know who you are.

5 October 2016 | 8 replies
Because they are having problems selling to "normal buyers" I would say you might be able to work something out beneficial to both parties if you wanted to get creative.

10 October 2016 | 6 replies
And if you did do seller financing, you would still need funds for rehab.To answer your question - seller financing can be beneficial for both parties if its done correctly.