Personally , I have a long time horizon because I am in mid 20s.

Strategy 2 is less risky in the short term but might require additional investment later.Ultimately, the choice between these strategies should consider both the financial implications and the investor's personal objectives, including risk tolerance, investment horizon, and the importance of generating immediate versus long-term value.Best of luck with your decisions - these are good options to have  😊Have a great weekend,KC 

Of course, I don't know what your time horizon is.

Good evening BP members, I am a week away from my closing date on my first property! Broke free of the "analysis paralysis" syndrome!! I have a rookie question in terms of management. After ensuring I had done all my ...

If you have a long time horizon/you won’t be retiring for 20+ years, put it in the most aggressive low-cost fund your plan offers.

If the city and neighborhood are good, all buildings are cheap if your time horizon is out long enough. 

The best advice I can give from the bigger investors I work with is to expand your time horizon.

I think there are some good things on the horizon but we are always going to be the slower side of the Smokies and I do think that the next 12-24 months are going to be rough. 

@Austin Sheppard @Charlie MacPherson is right, there are new regulations in Boston on the horizon and Airbnb and the City are at odds with one another.

I don't think values in these median home value segments will retrace, but people are realizing that with less FOMO in the market, and the days of rapid, double digit equity appreciation no longer likely, they may have a less chaotic market on the horizon.