Purchase price: $420,000 Cash invested: $33,300 Puchased this home with intention of padsplitting it.

Let's say 10% of them are criminal, with criminal intentions and criminal motives.

However, it must not have been your or their intention to avoid tax. 

This is my first time doing all this.Sir, the answers to your question can be found in 735 Ill.

Mortgages are all below 4.5% - no intention of changing those.

Of you’re tired of endless negotiations, shotgunning offers to sellers who have no intention of selling, or chasing every “deal” that’s never going to be sold at a price an investor can profit, give this method a shot.  

If the money is not held according to local landlord tenant law and/or was was spent (either intentionally or unintentionally), that act would be treated as an exclusion no different than under any other insurance policy.

To intentionally reduce the leverage more than required is a foreign concept to me especially in the San Diego market.  

It seems as if they intentionally made the breakdown of the payouts difficult to understand.

I've got a property under contractPurchase price $78K out the door (I have cash to close) Intent: build on the property which already has a functioning well, septic, and needs PGE installed Total buildout on the property utilities: $128K including the original land purchase price.