If I were a market renter I would have no problem paying increased rent to stay so walkable in a romantic location.

People buy the land many sight unseen, many internet sales, many out of state or even country because the land is so cheap and remarkably beautiful in the painted desert but so remote that only an artist like me wants to keep them all and have retreats for others too but I will sell some, upfront and disclosing....so when they realize or figure out it's not so romantic to them after all, unlike me, they stop paying taxes and let it go and the same lands get recycled over and over... 

I don't really look at the idea of landlording in some romantic notion.

I may have an opportunity to purchase a fourplex with a partner (non-romantic).

Then you both get to share bunks in the big house where you get romantically involved with other people you may not want to be romantically involved with.If anyone doubts the validity of the above paragraph, I would recommend you google: "Minerva Sanchez fraud" or just click on this link. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edca/pr/bay-area-real-estate-agent-arrested-orchestrating-fraudulent-short-sale-stanislaus

Account Closed,Like some magical romantic moments..."

Even better if you are in Camuy, the Romantic City and my hometown.

That new couple without kids might prefer a luxurious and romantic space, as well as a larger kitchen or dining room where they can entertain.

In MN that does not include romantic partners. 

I’m currently stationed close to Venice with the US Army and am eyeing investing into Italy’s most romantic city.