I did not use an agent to place this offer, I ordinarily would but my one man entity broker is currently unavailable.5. all cash deal6. fix and flip deal, I will be gutting the property, down to studs for rehabMy comments:In reference to #2 I will be restructuring the deal to address this for multiple reasons, 1 is I am interested in getting rid of the tenants as soon as possible, 2 is don't want any lingering "due outs" after closing and possession of the property.

Originally posted by @Aaron Klatt:A garage I would absolutely pay more for but I don't know if most tenants could justify $100/ month for a shed@Ryan Proffit @Jaron Walling Ordinarily I wouldn't, but like @Jaron Walling said, when you have a motorcycle, it is essential to have at least a shed.

She may have felt violated and backed into a corner about this in her kind ..who knows maybe as a kid she had somebody violate her trust in her bedroom or some weird life experience that triggered a past hurt and made her do something she wouldnt ordinarily do .

Save the money you would ordinarily put toward rent ($500-$1000 per month). 

Essentially the city has to agree to waive (to some extent) the taxes, violations, penalties, etc. that would ordinarily be required to be collected based upon the lien cert. 

I would not ordinarily be concerned, but they have dogs, so I cannot start showing it while they are still in it very easily. 

Section 453 (Installment Sales) allows investors to avoid the bulk of capital gains taxes ordinarily due on the sale their investment property.

Ordinarily, notwithstanding the common advice to start with a single family property, my preference is to acquire a fourplex, triplex, or duplex (in that order).

Investors always saw value in REIT to participate in ownership of assets they would not be able to own ordinarily, i.e. class A multifamily, industrial, commercial, retail, etc.

The good news is that I'll make a hefty gain on the sale of the house.Due to my current situation, I can see how I would ordinarily be eligible to a pro-rated exclusion, despite owning the house for less than the two year requirement, but what about the fact that I took advantage of the exclusion last year?