And it would be nice to have the disclosure language spelled out.

I assume there’s additional language in the PPM, or at least I’d hope, but the language can get very confusing by that point and many LPs don’t understand what they’re reading.

But thank you for providing the language to bring it up to the title company!

I've had some not happy when I have asked them to split it out.I've tried asking questions to the IRS customer service reps, and didn't have the best luck.While I cannot cite a specific official guidance on this issue, I consider debit cards exempt.

Bank was supposed to fund Thursday and official closing Friday.

One thing though is that there are requirements coming into effect soon where wholesalers will need to get their license in PA for any properties that they wholesale, so you might want to look into that before it becomes official!  

The Packwood, WA market may be officially saturated on STR's. 

She's not going to have any leg to stand on in court if you get that far unless there's some explicit language prohibiting the owner from assigning responsibilities to another legally authorized party, and I'm guessing there isn't if another PM company was maintaining the lease and provisions - and the fact that the tenant was voluntarily working with the other PM confirms the acceptance of an authorized agent even if it's not explicitly stated, the same way if you accept rent from a tenant after a lease expires you imply acceptance of the lease terms continuing (which is why you should always have a holdover provision). 

It does seem to use a little bit of vague language I guess when it comes to "can it be easily/cheaply done".  

Start here...have a solid lease with an Addendum of dealbreakers/rules that are written in plain everyday language.