If you're from Sacramento, CA be sure to say hi!

@Matt Chavez with the market in WA and CA being so hot right now, I would cash out while people are still crazy and buy an apartment building in a less expensive market with a higher rate of return.

Retired people moving to lower cost, small town cities all across the country.Of course, CA being what it is, also still attracts people to move here, hence the continued population growth.

Understanding there motivation up from ca be a big plus in completing the deal.

What I'm concerned is that the high voltage cabe might lower the resale value and I'm not sure whether the rent income could be able to cover all of the expenses.Could someone tell which option is better?

With me being in CA, would an LLC registered in CA be sufficient for out of state investing?

Like if you build 12 units, 8 ca be sold and builder should give you 4 - something like that.  

Here in CA, being just outside the city limits can be a good thing as you would fall under county jurisdiction which is less restrictive.However,and this might all be shite in SC, the city has the right to annex you if you're city adjacent.

My criteria for each follows.Owner Occupants-Specific Cities in Alameda County (CA)-LTV less than 40%-2 or more Beds and Baths-SFR & up to 4 units-Exclude Corporate Owned-14,280 total leadsAbsentee Owners-LTV less than 60%-All of Alameda County (CA)-Beds/baths/units are all the same as above-Last Sale Date before 2001-Including absentee owners that live in-state as California is quite large-731 total leadsSo, is there anything that I'm forgetting?

Hello everyone,I'm looking into investing in out of state rental properties, since I don't have the firepower to purchase in my home state of CA. Being