The Alabama Supreme Court has been looking for a test case so they can pivot to more rigorous pleading standards. 

In order to be in the upper echelon of available listings, or reach occupancy and rates above the average Joe, your listing needs to reign supreme.

i got supremely lucky.

And the state supreme court just illegally invalidated the will of the voters. 

The Supreme Court has interpreted “trade or business” for purposes of Section 162 to mean an activity conducted with “continuity and regularity” and with the primary purpose of earning income or making a profit.We would argue that rentals and general real estate investments fall under this auspice otherwise you wouldn’t do it.

When the California legislature passed tougher anti-crime laws in the 2000s, the legislators knew they wouldn't work (based on Justice Department statistics), but elected officials have to do what the voters want if they want to keep their jobs (assuming the Supreme Court is OK with the legislation).I believe each person is an individual and should be treated as such.

Well, history shows what happened both in terms of marginal tenants ultimately getting hurt (as did many landlords) and the Supreme Court ruling the Eviction Moratorium as unconstitutional.I see the whole idea of rent control, which is just another form of government invasion for political hopes, being bad for everyone. 

The primary test used to determine whether an instrument is a security is the Howey Test, which originated from the Supreme Court case SEC v.

Look, wrap your mind around fact this is same group that now that Supreme Court has given rulings they don't like, they are attacking the Supreme Court itself, making statements of how it needs to be changed, reduced in power etc..

They're not willing to face the SC Supreme Court and put their law licenses on the line over these deals.You can find Gary talking about this in a couple of different videos now.