THe house is selling way below its market value because it is currently junked up with the owner's possessions, and the owner is a curmudgeonly old guy who is not a savvy seller.However, I am simultaneously purchasing the major historic building in the downtown, so I just don't have the capital to purchase this house.

The most recent lease offer (residential for a doctor's family, 2 year lease) at $2,500 prompted my agent to try to do a dual deal, whereby he would sell the house to an investor and simultaneously close the lease to the renter.

You mention transactional funding, but that is only a day which mans you would have to be doing a simultaneous close.

Keeping it really has the same effect.You're probably going to have to be able to qualify for both houses simultaneously with no rental income considered.

You can have multiple apps installed on your phone simultaneously and each can have a different number.

Some title companies will let you use the buyer's money for both transactions - a double close or simultaneous close (same thing).

Pick one.On the buyer's end, they would have that same contingency as they are taking over the contract, unless you make an entireley new purchase agreement with them and double close (simultaneously close)

After that or simultaneously looking for other deals to flip with private or hard money to increase rental portfolio.

That said, I have become increasingly interested in taking the plunge into investing in real estate and I like the idea of potentially accomplishing a couple different goals simultaneously ("killing two birds with one stone" as they say), and perhaps Alaska is a way for me to do that.

@Andrew Watson, the point is: at least ONE of your simultaneous mortgages (by definition) will NOT be for your primary, so therefore, their INVESTMENT lending policies kick in!