
4 June 2013 | 8 replies
disclosure disclosure disclosure.my brokerage limits the number of my own 100% commission deals.I think if you have a partner one should have license, and the other not (to do off the market deals easier)that's my 2 cents

3 January 2019 | 9 replies
a) Getting on title is preferable, say you buy on a wrap AITD or contract for sale in California, get on title, then sell on lease option.b) You could get sales licensed in California and sell on lease option via a listing agreement and get a 3% commission.

17 June 2013 | 9 replies
This is why for new agents they have the website they give you, business cards, etc.They want you to feel a sense of obligation to them so it will make it harder for you to leave when you search out a better commission split etc.

6 June 2013 | 24 replies
It seems to me the only question was who would pay the commission.

13 June 2013 | 12 replies
Keep in mind you will probably have to pay a Realtor commission if you choose to work with one.????

12 June 2013 | 19 replies
If he's a commission-based guy selling mutual funds, annuities, and whole life policies, forget it!).

13 July 2013 | 4 replies
When you are closing on a purchase of an apartment complex, who generally pays the broker's commission - the seller, or the buyer is expected to cover some of the cost as well?

15 September 2013 | 6 replies
If we wholesale a property do we pay taxes on our commission?

20 June 2013 | 5 replies
Look for an office to hang your license in that doesn't have min. quotas and doesn't take a split of your commissions.
18 June 2013 | 16 replies
However the commission, if I were licensed, on some of these properties is much more than that finders fee.