
31 May 2017 | 24 replies
CPAs will tell you the taxation intricacies

29 August 2017 | 39 replies
@Darsh PatelHey Darsh: Great question.From an investors perspective based on growth not taxation or asset protectionIf you want the best taxation advise talk to a good accountant or CPA.

6 June 2017 | 4 replies
A few thoughts...that need to be verified since the situation is reversed:1) you will likely need to file Canadian income taxes for rent received and later for capital gains when you sell.2) there is a tax treaty between the two countries that intends to avoid double taxation, but you have to watch for situations where it doesn't work.

18 November 2016 | 3 replies
A Solo 401k is not subject to this UDFI taxation.

26 November 2016 | 7 replies
Also I have opened up a LLC and have heard getting s Corp status for the LLC can help some taxation as well.

8 January 2017 | 1 reply
I have a 10% tax penalty plus income tax at the 25% tax bracket.

11 January 2017 | 10 replies
I am not sure about a Roth SDIRA, but with other SDIRA, the part borrowed will be subject to UBIT taxation.

23 August 2019 | 10 replies
Meaning your entire cashflow+equity can be tax-free recapture-free used in the next property. 1031 sounds great although you'll have to pay Uncle Sam a big tax at the last property.

6 July 2017 | 6 replies
You can also specify things like: "Equity in the property due to mortgage paydown will go to X partner while equity in the property due to market fluctuation will go to Y partner"Essentially, you can split income, deductions and gains in any manner you like, so long as you are cognizant of legal issues like usury laws, foreign taxation, etc.
10 July 2017 | 5 replies
@Olivia DansereauIf this investor is the same LLC partner you mentioned in your post yesterday, then the transaction is a no-go for reasons of self-dealing with disqualified parties.The Solo 401(k) can lend withing the limits of state usury laws.Typically, a loan for real estate rehab would be 2-3 points and 12-16% interest.If the loan is including a "split of the profits" and an attempt to mask equity share of profits, then the IRS would likely challenge that as subject to UBIT taxation.