Another example of government flexing its overreaching muscle.

Its just like an ach withdrawal into the bank in your town. 

They should be jointly and separately liable for the rental and sign one lease but I allow them to pay via ACH separately. 

This software has some hidden fees in ACH transfers, which are charged to the property manager for every ACH transfer a total of $.50 and could be more depending on the days it takes to transfer.

My tenants take rent directly to my bank by either ACH/direct deposit, mail it to the bank, or go to the bank in person.

The biggest issue at the time was having funds returned, but that's a function of the antiquated ACH system not because of the eRentPayment service.

Theres a lot of debt to go around in my house, as my younger brother (19) has a combination of a defect in his aorta valve as well as the disease hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (probably spelled that wrong, its the same disease that most of the young highschool atheletes died of on the court/field from being undiagnosed, thankfully his aorta defect allowed for frequent testings and caught it ahead of time) and a mytochondrial defficiency in his skeletal muscles.

Get her on an ACH debiting service that takes the money from her account the day after she is paid.

So my preferred monthly payment is 900. 900*12=10800.00Money at close 40000-10800=29200275000-29200=245800245800/900=274So my note terms would be:Remaining balance of 245800 to be paid in 274 equal payments of 900.00This would get the debt service payed to the seller (40k) and give her an income stream without the head ache.

I can do an 0% ACH balance transfer from my available credit card balances to my checking/savings account.