What cash-flow, if any, you plan to generate from this property.If you are short on cash and/or your rental projections will be tight, then the 7/1 ARM might make more sense.If you are good on cash and/or your rental projects show that you will be generating sufficient cash flow, then the 30-year fixed might be a better option.I have used both mortgage vehicles for my properties, dependent on my situation at the time.  

Do you have a current need for that cash flow generated from the tax savings?

For my senior project, I am researching the ideal marketing strategy for a hypothetical (but could become real) multi-unit Tiny Home STR property in Malibu, CA (with the potential to generate huge cash flow and long-term equity ;)To graduate, I need a guest from a real estate company to sit in on my final presentation (10 minutes) and to provide brief feedback (3-5 minutes) on Tuesday, April 23rd at 3:00 PM PST on Zoom (15 minutes total).

I've also been told that the panels still generate energy when it is cloudy.

However this direction would add a much higher value to the property.Personally I do think there is great appeal to the idea of being mobile, low footprint, minimalist living combined with affordable housing - especially for the millennial crowd who are saddled with enormous student loan debt and earning lower wages than the generation before them.

My expertise are wholesaling and ACTUALLY MOTIVATED seller lead generation.

The primary goal is to generate rental income.

I have some larger MF deals only doing $50-100 per door but will generate great long term wealth.  

For a couple mil you can generate income like Mit Romney.

There are so many rent controlled buildings that generate such little rent, with owners that paid 50-200K in the 70's that should be easy to turn into deals now.