I am betting 0. because anger and blame is easy.

@Carini Rochester I agree with Greg but to be clear Good Cause does not require a landlord to provide free housing, it just forces them go through the onerous and expensive and lengthy process of actually going for non payment eviction instead of a hold over proceeding, when the landlord knows that a monetary judgement is worthless and just wants possession of their rental unit back so they can fix it back up and rent it again hopefully to a great tenant.Also the problem with all this is that from 2019 to now, landlords have gotten used to having economically or physically vacant units and have priced that risk in. 

(I know a lot of investors who are doing this, but I've been surprised to find out that it's a new concept that others haven't considered.)The more units, the better in this scenario because you can hedge your bets with more units.

I would do all of those prior to giving up 50% upside on a physical RE investment to someone who has little risk, and is offering their time.

I’ll bet if Peace has a forum there’s people talking about BP and being negative “what they’re teaching takes so long!!”

Although the property is worth way more than the loan we are needing and the secured collateral lien is really a sure safe bet and some easy money for someone willing to take the chance that isn't in it for anything other than to flip their money for profit/wanting to add to their portfolio, this would be an good opportunity for someone just starting out in real estate investment even.

Your best bet would be to find a portfolio lender whose niche aligns with your investment strategy. 

To confirm my recommendation ask him for references at his current developments, I bet he won’t give you names and will make up an excuse!

They grow both physically and with inflation.  

In my opinion, that is a riskier bet because you have to have a big pile of cash for contingencies.