Not sure what the point of this post was with the incorrect information.

One thing that would be cheap is to see if HCD would take a stance that jurisdiction’s interpretation is incorrect.  

It is sometimes incorrectly called "all risk". 

It may be good for CRM.When I said bad data..Many of the properties e.g. failed listings failed two years back..filters don't produce correct reports, MLS listings are incorrect- seems like they dont refresh regulalry, equity and rate seems like guesses.Having said that I still believe it may be the best of all.Thanks for your responseQuote from @Justin Silverio: @Sandeep Dhall I'm curious what you mean by bad data. 

@Abigail Lipson if you want actual assistance, then share what you've done so far and ask if you've missed anything or made incorrect assumptions.To just ask for general assistance or for someone to share their evaluation criteria makes you appear lazy and wanting other people to do your work for you.One of our company's mantras comes into play here, "if you don't ask the right questions, you won't get the right answer".Please ask better, more specific questions, so we can better assist you:)

So it would help to know the specific numbers and exact property you are considering so we can help you identify what numbers may be input incorrectly. 

It has nothing to do with hate, and everything to do with being able to recognize an extra cost that could possibly pop up on certain turns.And if you still think there's some type of hate in this post, I think you were just reading it incorrectly.

IRS CCA pretty much came out in 21 and confirmed Sch C is incorrect for MOST STR owners unless you provide substantial services.

I feel like I must be looking at this incorrectly, and in theory it makes sense I would increase cash flow with the addition of some leverage, but when I run the numbers I just don’t see how to get these.

And your $ sign is incorrect in its placement in the ad.