The Supreme Court was very clear on these clauses: We determine that because the lease includes a provision in violation of § ATCP 134.08(3), the landlord, Baierl, may not enforce the lease against the tenants.

., but again enforcement may be after the fact.  

My only thing is why they didn’t enforce a renewal option on their contract.

Whereas in the past lenders did not attempt to enforce the “due on sale” clause, this was in an era when interest rates were heading lower and transfers of ownership were not easy to identify.  

I'm concerned with how to enforce any rules now that he's trying to skirt the lease.

Regardless of who wrote the lease, if it violates state law it is not enforceable.

If the lender does find out that a property transfer has taken place, and chooses to enforce the due on sale clause, the lender must provide the seller (debtor) and, if applicable to state law, buyer with notification of default under the mortgage or deed of trust, and specific time as specified by state law to cure the default.  

My only thing is why they didn’t enforce a renewal option on their contract.

If they are VERY professional, they will have their processes in writing as verification that policies are enforced equally and fairly by their entire staff.6.

Seems like tens of millions of dollars were raised from unaccredited investors...Here are some SEC links for a partner and CFO of Norada showing previous fraud history:https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releas...https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2017/comp240...Based on what has been uncovered so far with the partnership between Marco and Ronald Fossum who has already been guilty of defrauding investors and barred by the SEC from participating in activity like this, I would say, yeah, there is a high likelihood of fraud in this case.