Every successful investor that I know has a core network of people they work with regularly.

I'm trying to make it as compelling as possible.

Safe Act (Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act) is more of a bridge to existing regulation such as RESPA and Regulation Z than any sort of hard core rules to abide by.

I came to the realization that improvements aren't the core business. 

The rental market to students is best left to larger companies or the lucky folks with core student properties close in to the university.  

I want to give myself this week to finish and next week to hard core review.

I'd suggest using other methods unless you have some compelling reason to do so.

Urban core there is a still a difference but not as much.

One argument that is completely non compelling to me is the one about expenses.- Marking to find new clients: REALLY not my problem- Overhead: Fair enough but find ways to cut expenses.

Considerations in determining the eligibility of a borrower for one of these exceptions are the length of time the previous property was owned by the borrower and the circumstances that compel the borrower to purchase another residence with an FHA insured mortgage.