On the plus side, I'd wager it's more accurate than a lot of assessor's data...

Granted it depends upon the way the property was constructed, but I'd wager they never did it with the intention of it being split out.

It won't tell you everything about the markets, submarkets, etc. but I'm willing to guess that you'll end up with some sort of "gut reaction" to each of the markets.I'd wager a box of donuts that if you visit those 4 markets you won't end up viewing them all in the same light. 

I’d wager rates stand a better chance of going up over the next 6 months than coming down 🤷🏻‍♂️

I'd wager there are people looking for deals in Dallas all day, every day, and have no other competing time constraints. 

I'd wager a dozen donuts it's going to be a full-recourse loan and (as such) they're going to want to know that the property (and the person) are good for the money.

However, I would wager most do have errors and omissions clauses that would erroneous or false info.  

I would wager that there is a history here, I would suggest starting with that.  

It appears that you caught the real estate "bug" along the way, and I'd wager this is the first of many.

Which is virtually all it has been to date, as far as I can tell.I don't care to wager the likelihood of his proposal actually seeing the light of day, as I don't believe our legislative branch has even begun to take this on.