I could arrange the meetings remotely but the main problem is that agents will for sure answer to either me or potential buyer with feedbacks like the following quoted ones are (i repeat again: those are assumed verbal feedbacks the RE agent or broker could say to me or to potential buyer - they would prevent the possibility of me coming in the middle of them): "I am not legally allowed to try to sell the RE for different price comparing to the price I clearly stated on our agency's website""There is no way I could mention your name to the potential buyer as owner of the RE if you are not.

At this stage I would keep things simple. 

We are in the very beginning stages of our careers and we don’t foresee having the time to do all the research.

I also suppose that if you have a really cheap cost of housing, or some other arrangements (like taking care of a parent in their house for free living),  then it could make sense.I'd be interested in knowing more of your thinking on this. 

But it will work for your legal arrangement.

Seriously, at this stage in the market.

For this arrangement we will both share 50/50 any flip or rental profits.

The new house is in a very good neighborhood, and I need to act fast while its still under the owner-occupied stage.

It's just for show, as far as these guys are concerned, the money belongs to the rich co-workerSo it all depends on your personal situation.It's funny that the bank made all this fuss during the qualifying stage, but at the closing, they don't check or care to see where the funds came from.

If separate, then what are the costs to get to beginning stage of building?