there’s a funny debate on this. we put it on one of our rentals in SoCal and it’s netter us in a positive way and made us more attractive to prospective tenants.that being said, IF it were truly lucrative I think we’d see more corporate apartments like Greystar and Redwood installing solar panels.If you do install, make sure you figure out what tax credits you qualify for etc and make sure your output is covered by the panels for day AND night. theres no sun at night.. so make sure when they design they dont hide that. the salespeople are shady with that aspect and it’s annoying.

.- Investor-Friendly Climate: Columbus has relatively manageable regulations and property taxes, making it attractive for real estate investors.While investing out of state does come with its challenges, such as property management from afar, partnering with a local property management company can help ease these concerns.

Or put more money in and perhaps throw good money in after bad.Neither option is attractive but delay only compounds the problem.No one is going to rescue you on this deal.

I am primarily invested in Tampa but I have properties inland near other attractions, some right on the beach, etc. 

@Patrick Forelli 50/50 split over an 8% pref when the LP is bringing 70-80% of the initial investment is not going to be all that attractive.

With Evolve at 10%, it's attractive, but you're still stuck with guest communications, finding the cleaner, stocking supplies, and overall general maintenance and boots-on-the-ground management of your property. 8/10 times I recommend my clients find professional management.

For this property, you would be wise to incorporate the income from the other units against your debt service to make the property more attractive to lend on.

there goes that 'cash flow' that was promised.and with interest rates where they are, even those supposedly attractive low PP houses just won't cash flow very much.can you house hack in CA instead?

This may be a really naive question, but it got me thinking, is it more attractive to a rent a home in an area where most of the surrounding area owns?

The price is attractive at about 3.6 plus 80ct for the underlayment.