Make sure lead paint is in there properly and you give them there notices if needed along with them checking acknowledgement of that in the lease as well as the cert. 

That way, you're acknowledging and thanking her for the gifts she's already given you and giving her a good tip/insight for what you might actually WANT this time. 

We have spoken with state senators about this, and they recognize and acknowledge the problems, but I don't see any movement.

@Kira DAnnunzio told me a story about her duplex where the prior owner never got a license and she had a nightmare of a time just getting the city to acknowledge that it was properly zoned for a duplex as it had always been. 

So, realistically, they're a cost associated with having rentals, regardless of whether you choose to amortize them across your holdings or not (from an accounting standpoint, you should not...from an analysis standpoint, I think you're fooling yourself if you don't).Anyway, my take is that you have a bunch of costs that you either haven't yet experienced (but will) or aren't acknowledging (and should).

Unfortunately in 99% of cases, the inspector has zero liability and most of them have you acknowledge that or sign a waiver.

Tenant acknowledges that__________(Whatever appliances)___, are provided as a convenience and will not be replaced upon failure.

She acknowledges that there was no damage to the apartment whatsoever. 

Anyway, I did not want to renew, I sent an email, certified 60 day letter they refused to acknowledge, I had to loose one months rent, and it cost me an additional $2000 to fix the place back up bc they trashed it also..

These cases are rare, but is probably the only 'big bad' that I can think of, that you would be at risk for.But, no, you probably can not assume that the tenant agrees to all clauses of your proposed lease without his/her signature/acknowledgement.