Since they are already swindling feel free to not jump on the band wagon.

And you can't tell them the insurance won't allow it because yes it they do the insurance allows a trampoline you can't just Swindle them and add things in it is against the law there is no loophole here they already signed the lease you never specified no trampolines that is all your fault on your end and you don't need insurance to have a trampoline understand that right now it's all you can do is learn from your mistake and next time if you don't want somebody renting from you that possibly could put a swing set or trampoline on your property then you need to put it in the lease not tell them anything if you tell them your insurance won't cover it then you are literally crossing a line where they can sue you if you add it into the next lease they can sue you this is something that should have been brought up since day one before they signed the lease to start with and understand if you're renting a house that backyard's not yours while they're renting it that is their backyard and as long as their backyard is picked up and not dirty or filthy and have a whole bunch of stuff all over the place especially if they have kids a trampoline is completely legal especially if it's got a net around it if it doesn't have a net around it then you can say you need to put a net around it that's the most you can do specially because of trampoline with a net around it is completely 100% legal and follows all guidelines unless they're older children like teenagers then they don't need a net around it I'll repeat this one more time legally if you are renting a home and you didn't specify since day one then there is nothing you can do now learn from that mistake and if you don't want nobody ever doing it again then you have to tell him in the lease not tell them to their face it has to be printed in their lease from day one and you can't just change the lease and say no trampolines on their next one nor can you kick them out for a trampoline as long as they're cleaning up all the toys and stuff that's not technically a toy so you understand that it's not a toy it falls under more of exercise machinery and you can't deny people that

You must VET them heavily to ensure you are not being swindled.

You still have the illegal net listing part for sure, I think and this is where the law gets a little messy maybe you are correct and it’s not technically a fiduciary, maybe it’s owning honestly to all parties in a transaction but I don’t think the state Intends to have there licensees (which confers status to the public) that use that license to swindle old people out of ten’s of thousands of dollars, regardless it’s an illegal net listing but any definition.

Permits keep your city/county’s pockets fat, so that they can sit around a table and come up with more ways to swindle you out of your money.

Not sure how Indiana RE agency law works, but in California you need to disclose that you are a licensed agent anytime you're buying or selling 1-4 units, and even if you provide full disclosure, with off market properties sellers can sometimes argue (depending on their attorneys competence) they were swindled.

So, its sort of swindling them...Or, the buyer needs to pay the high rate of 10% because they are unable to obtain a loan. 

Unless you are an institutional firm in the US, you run the added risk of being swindled, hustled, and straight up robbed by places in the world that would appeal to is American investors because it makes sense "on paper".

He told me many stories and showed me numerous sites where people have been and are in the process of being swindled out of large investment funds by unscrupulous land developers there.

I am in no way trying to swindle this guy.