If you're paying beer and cigarette money wages or hiring the guy whose the cheapest, you get what you get.   

This in common with people who smoke cigarettes.

In my opinion it is no different than discriminating against smokers.  

Also if they are small burn marks it could have been cigarette burns.

So you don't want to include language that hints that you prefer not to rent to any particular group.Examples:Okay = "Minimum income = $2,700/month gross"Bad = "This unit is best for a married couple who both work"Okay = "Maximum occupancy 6 persons"Bad = "This unit is perfect for a single couple"Okay = "No smokers allowed"Bad = "No Asians allowed"Okay = "No pets allowed"Bad = "No children allowed"Okay = "This unit is located near Main Street and 23rd Street"Bad = "This unit is located near St.

No, normally it would be cigarettes.

There are very few exceptions such as for products that are harmful to children (cigarettes, alcohol etc.).

If you walked the unit ahead of time you likely knew he was a smoker if he was there seven years and you've owned the place for two.

@Nate Baumann let me start by saying I vape myself - I quit smoking and switched to vapor over a year ago without one cigarette since!

I wouldn't worry too much about the smoker in the upper unit.