Since you haven't done that to ay great extent, readers here are likely to think you are simply here to be a shill for Renatus.

Well that’s great and all, but doesn’t give much detail and makes it sound an awful lot like a shill for that company. 

Not a lot of objective info out there mostly just attorneys and accountanting firms shilling their product.

However, now the implicit assuming is that they are just shills, fake accounts, marketing accounts, etc. and not actual users providing genuine (positive) feedback.  

That behavior just screams "shill" to me, but I've been wrong before.To address the OP, Martin CS, it sounds to me like you're over paying for what you get.

These are mostly shills and other bottom feeders who are on the site just to PM their links to other members, but it is something that I have to deal with every day - complaints from members about some new member spamming them.Some of these people are dumb enough to PM me with a bunch of spammy nonsense too . . .

This man, and there were a few others like him, were shills -- operatives to encourage those who might be hesitant to join up to change their minds.After the meeting, the woman who told me about Renatus (she had arrived later, again a coincidence ) suggested I talk with Steve S. about the rental property. 

I read the comments section of the article and it amounted to half of the people screaming about scams and the other half shilling for the companies named in the article.Is it too good to be true? 

His other retirement posts are good, his other general posts are good, the EIUL stuff is junk.I will say that he actually believes it - I don't think he's a shill for an insurance company, and I don't think he makes money off it.

Beware of shills -- "decoy" references paid by a plan's promoter to describe their fictional success in earning money through the plan. 6.