I know this style of presenting multiple offers has been brought up by some and used, probably began as a guru twist as a great idea that made things different and exciting, but I'm pretty sure I've had more sales transaction presentations than they have, go with simple.Bryan mentions lease-options, those can get you the initial control and use of a property, but they are simply a lease agreement conveying rights of tenancy with an option to buy the property later on.

I see now where you wrote it above.The IRS sure has some twisted and conflicting interpretations of their own rules.

Gentle ones, saying "Just had a baby, might have missed it, but don't have record of...etc.etc."

Nothing a few twists of an allen key can't fix.

I market "MY" properties mostly to California investors that want a hands off investment and 99.9% use my property management company for the day to day operations.I want to add a new twist that my partners believe will necessate involving the DRE, DOC, SEC, or some other agency to complicate our lives.........I don't think we do but I need to look into it..........

Mark here is a different twist to consider.

Hi guys,I put up my current home up for rent and as a twist I decided I'll give it a shot and also offer the house furnished and bump up the price (around $350/month extra) since the house is nicely decorated and has everything a renter would need and it's updated.

But here's an interesting twist:  the insurance company directly told us that under no circumstance will they cover a pitbull biting someone.

Just another twist on what you could do with your money.

My gut thinks they will claim they cannot close because the wording could be twisted to say that their agreement was only based on using traditional lending which they actually cannot get (whether true or not).