
25 April 2024 | 209 replies
Russell when does this take effect ?

24 April 2024 | 6 replies
To that effect, I'm thinking of offering to cover half of the excess usage ($500 for Jan/Feb - $100 Normal Usage = $400 split in 2).
24 April 2024 | 4 replies
Thanks It’s not a $1 property, it’s really property in most cases at minimum an 150k property after repair expenses that might only be worth 100k in effect it’s not a one dollar property, it’s a negative 50k property.

26 April 2024 | 44 replies
Providing funds outside of a transaction that would effect the LTV given by an insured lender could lead to mortgage fraud, money laundering and wire fraud as funds are disbursed.

23 April 2024 | 2 replies
Price your apartment effectively so that it reflects market value. 2.

24 April 2024 | 30 replies
Today, it is also cost effective to do studies on smaller investments.

24 April 2024 | 8 replies
If so then its really related to the investments and doesn’t effect you personally.

24 April 2024 | 14 replies
So, effectively getting some of the profit tax free.

24 April 2024 | 4 replies
We have in effect done a pocket veto as we have not responded, but I plan on responding indicating we need above LTR rates otherwise we can just switch to LTR increasing our revenue due to reduced expenses.

24 April 2024 | 4 replies
My goal: create an interest-free loan which is appealing to a potential homebuyer, yet doesn't make too big of a discount on my end.For example: If I sold my $300,000 house with 20% down ($60,000) over 30 years, at 6.7% interest rate: $1548.67 principal and interest per month1548.67 x 12 x 30 = $557,521.20What I would do would offer a lower monthly payment and no usury, but it would effectively be like a prepayment penalty.Arbitrarily, let's say 20% off the monthly payment, or $309.73 less per month: $1238.94 monthly payment.House would be sold at $446,018.40, which is $111,502.8 less than the total paid with a normal mortgage, but $116,018 more than the market price.