RESIDENT understands that any proactive steps OWNER has taken are neither a guarantee nor a warranty that there will be no criminal acts or that RESIDENT should be free from the violent tendencies of the third persons.

The government is in control of the largest ponzi scheme in history and yet they had the gaul to call Madoff a criminal and lock him up for doing the same thing they are doing.Government = biggest hypocrites of all time.

These are civil (not criminal) cases, so I believe that once the deadline for appeals passes the decision then is final.Now, if there are damages to be sought by somebody long after the cases have been through the courts - in that case the lenders (and the GSEs too) might be forced to pay.

Each person signing this Affidavit understands that any misrepresentation made by him or her in the Affidavit may subject him or her to civil and criminal liability.In light of this language, my client has decided to comply completely so that they don't face any kind of liabilities.

Being prepared for criminal activity, which happens all the time across the country.

The policy makers would probably rival or exceed the criminal minds in any prison....well, I guess exceed, since they aren't there.

Again, when someone states that something is illegal after the Supreme Court has already determined that its not, I'm going to side with the Supreme Court.The fact that the sources are non-educated drug-addicts are irrelevant to this discussion...but worth noting because someone's level of education and past criminal activity can be a good indicator of their likelihood to know what they are talking about and whether they choose to present the information in a factual manner.

Specific exclusions; eminent domain, civil disturabnce/unrest, marshal law, loss arising from criminal activities....and more, take your pick!

I told a high ranking police officer here that I thought that most of the force would have been criminals if they had not joined the police force.....he agreed!

The Law suits against Bank of America and Countrywide whom they purchased, with respect to their miss management of their mortgage portfolio may be a bigger concern especially if wikilieaks has information substantiating criminal actions in this regard.I have found Bank of America to be grossly incompetent when it comes to modifications and in my opinion borderline criminal but if their unbelievable lack of concern for their customers turns out to be intentional and criminal they will pay the price. i would not have my money with the Bank of America.