
22 November 2008 | 5 replies
The SMLLC is considered a disregarded entity for income tax purposes and is still treated as if the individual owns the interest in real estate.

1 April 2008 | 2 replies
Because of this Congress believed that a rental real estate investment in which a taxpayer has significant responsibilities and which served a significant non-tax purpose should be treated differently than the activities meant to be limited under the passive loss provisions.

5 May 2008 | 9 replies
You do have to make payments based on a 5-year schedule or the loan could be treated as a premature distribution with tax and penalties. 8)

8 June 2009 | 11 replies
You must treat this as a business, not a scratch off lottery ticket.

1 April 2008 | 2 replies
I also wanted to know how entities get treated as opposed to individuals in that regard.

27 March 2008 | 4 replies
You don't have accelerated depreciation anymore so therefore no recapture.You don't want to have any rental income in the S-corp because that is passive income and you can have a good chance of falling into the passive income rules under the S-corp and be subject to passive income penalty tax.Have you had any consulting on how to treat each of your properties?

21 July 2011 | 22 replies
This account is not an escrow for the paying of real estate taxes, insurance premiums, delinquent notes, ground rents or assessments, and is not to be treated as such.

2 April 2008 | 0 replies
The IRS often gets involved with short sales, because they are seen as a relief of debt and may be treated as income.

8 April 2008 | 8 replies
Folks treated it like a hotel.

14 May 2008 | 27 replies
But I agree you gotta play by the rules, I'm seeing guys drop left and right, a lot of it is because of the economy but part of it is because they try to cut corners and not treat it as a business, I'm grateful for my contacts and try to do my part to keep them, seems to work well, I am able to stay busy without advertising :D