Thanks for the heads up, I’ll call the mortgage companies.  

I am having trouble following you can always send the money to an insurance company. 

I recently moved back to the U.S. after almost two decades working in international development and entrepreneurship across the African continent, from co-founding a tech-enabled logistics company in Ghana to negotiating public-private partnerships for infrastructure investments in Senegal.

Investments from CA tech companies is driving job and population growth. 

This isn't a lending requirement but have some boots on the ground other than just the construction company.

The mortgage would stay under the seller's name.The buyer could then rent out the unit, renovate, etc. to increase cash flow or make more money.But aside from a possible "due on clause" being called by the mortgage company, what's the benefit to the seller?

The goal is to keep these for rentals.I currently own the land personally and am funding the builds with a combination of HELOC and cash - no bank debt tied to these properties specifically.

@Jeffery Jones As someone who owns 6 single-family homes under the Section 8 program and runs a property management company that manages over 100 Section 8 properties, I’ve learned a lot about the ins and outs of the program—not just the idealized version often shared on social media.If done correctly, Section 8 can be a great way to diversify a portfolio.

Our fund includes a portfolio of over 15 companies that form the foundation behind the Notes.

We've done more than 20 projects, many of which were funded (at least in part) by hard money lenders.