Plus, it has the added benefits of anonymity.

My point wasn't to be anonymous, but rather to provide a legal shield so that if something were to happen that would cause someone to want to sue me, they would only be able to hold me liable based on the assets of the business, not my personal assets.I hope that makes more sense.

I like the idea of using a business name, mostly for anonymity when your dealing with rentals / evictions, even selling new or resale homes.

This will provide asset protection for your properties and anonymity so no one will know that you are the owner of the properties, and any searches won't reveal that they are your properties, and no one will be able to see what you paid for any of your properties.

Land trusts provide asset protection and anonymity.

I understand that the benefit of structuring in this regard is to add layers of anonymity, create some versatility, and structure so that in event of lawsuit all of our assets are not  exposed. 

And it costs money to maintain the structures.Full anonymity vs no anonymity is your choice.

In Florida I use a Florida Land Trust to keep the transfer of title anonymous to the lender so they don't call the loan due. 

Looking over your pros & cons...I think your pros far outweigh your cons.In regards to your thoughts on personal responsibility...you could put your home in a trust for anonymity sake (although that might not hide the fact that you that any potential litigants against you know you  live there).  

I already have a CPA and I'm looking at options such as setting up with anonymity in mind with a "parent" LLC in Delaware, for example, which would contain other LLC's/ land trusts in Texas / etc where I will be involved in deals.