The literature also indicates that if the ESA directly threatens the health or well being of anyone on the premises than it can be denied as well, yet I have also read that allergies are not considered a "direct threat to health"... but it doesn't mention if the allergy induces asthmatic episodes.

The literature also indicates that if the ESA directly threatens the health or well being of anyone on the premises than it can be denied as well, yet I have also read that allergies are not considered a "direct threat to health"... but it doesn't mention if the allergy induces asthmatic episodes.

The literature also indicates that if the ESA directly threatens the health or well being of anyone on the premises than it can be denied as well, yet I have also read that allergies are not considered a "direct threat to health"... but it doesn't mention if the allergy induces asthmatic episodes.

In addition, the owner of the home must not own more than three single-family homes.3) They are unable to provide sufficient documentation, such as the emotional support animal letter, that verifies the ESA is necessary for their health and well-being.4) The tenant provides fraudulent documentation attesting to their need for an emotional support animal (usually a fake emotional support animal letter).5) The landlord can demonstrate that making accommodations for an ESA would impose undue financial burden or logistical burden. 6) The animal is destructive to the property or displays threatening behaviors that could put other tenants or yourself at risk.7) The size or nature of the animal makes it impossible to house safely or humanely.

I think you should threaten to work with a public adjuster but save the 10% they charge off the top until you actually need it.

I explained to them my limitations and approach but they threaten to not pay because they do not believe the bill reflects their usage.

When I call BS and ask why no contact, she vaguely threatens that I now owe IRS 9k and I should let her work if I don't want to pay that.

Homeowner believes they can threaten lawsuit based on Dodd Frank, CFPB non compliance, DTP, etc., and obtain “better” result4.

In my other properties with high-earning tenants, I can get a judgment and garnish their wages, threaten their pristine credit that they actually care about, go after their savings, etc.

They are threatening to put my loan into default if I don't give them the documents.