You may recoup the money, but there's also a good chance you'll lose some.

I feel sorry for the people losing everything in the fires , insurance will go up .But I wish I was the guy  driving this bulldozer ;t=162s

So infilling an income gap via people who can disappear just as easily as appear seems short sighted to me. 

I have been using Stessa for years and don't want to lose all that I have stored in the program. 

As when people lose their jobs, the vacations they take is the first choice to cut back on. 

If they pay late now as is, let's say they lose a job or have a temporary loss of income, you're kind of SOL.I would look to build reserves between now and August.

Nobody plans to lose their property.

It's very easy for us to lose sight of these truths and blame performance on over-saturation and legislation.

If you reduce to $2,300 and are able to fill the property faster, yes, you are "losing" $100 per month, but even at that rate, it would take two whole years to equal the loss of the $2,400 vacancy month.

Business owners won't want to get tied up in litigation and if there is a good chance they will lose, it is easier to simply follow the contract.How would that work with a lower-end tenant?