(i) The term "Insured" also includes(A) successors to the Title of the Insured by operation of law as distinguished from purchase, including heirs,devisees, survivors, personal representatives, or next of kin;(B) successors to an Insured by dissolution, merger, consolidation, distribution, or reorganization;(C) successors to an Insured by its conversion to another kind of Entity;(D) a grantee of an Insured under a deed delivered without payment of actual valuable considerationconveying the Title(1) if the stock, shares, memberships, or other equity interests of the grantee are wholly-owned by thenamed Insured,(2) if the grantee wholly owns the named Insured,(3) if the grantee is wholly-owned by an affiliated Entity of the named Insured, provided the affiliatedEntity and the named Insured are both wholly-owned by the same person or Entity, or(4) if the grantee is a trustee or beneficiary of a trust created by a written instrument established by theInsured named in Schedule A for estate planning purposes.

They argue that it is my responsibility for bill because of the scale build up and sludge.

This is how I’ve scaled up.

Before you do that, figure out how you will scale. 

I get when scaling up and I get more properties to get a manager.

All Class A properties, everything was going well until I decided to scale by buying more properties, which were Class C and cash flow positive on paper or at least not negative.

House hacking is a great way to get started, but it doesn't scale very well.

Hello BiggerPockets community,I am a new Real Estate Investor and would love to get some feedback on our strategy.Goal: Achieve sustainable income of net $10K/month, while the properties appreciate long term. I am a b...

Since you say property management I'm assuming 100+ units when you get full scale.

From The House Hacking Strategy, published by BP (and I'm a case study in the book), Craig talks about the profitability to comfortability scale.