***Para todos mis queridos compañeros en el negocio de bienes raices, quiero tambien extenderles una coordial invitacion para que quizas podamos discutir un poco del mercado aqui en San Antonio, y si es posible, llegar a trabajar juntos.

I have a friend who invests in an area of Delaware that is essentially flat in terms of job growth and a number of other factors that most real estate investors wouldn't even bat an eyelash at.

I also want to be able to either collect the only key they have and/or be able to de-activate their key if they were to "lose it" or when they move out.  

From there you just lay out the strategies and pick the one that seems to fit the investor's needs and budget.As a side note: For anyone in California, I look into the Delaware Statutory Trust.

When a couple of landlords filed a suit against the Council, on the grounds that judges being unelected officials should not be legislating -- (hold your breath, for the incredible insanity yet to come) - the state Assembly stepped up to deliver the coup de grace.SF ***.

I’m in a Delaware beach town and don’t have room for a hot tub.

@Jorge De Jesus the area I’m looking at is 1960 and 249.

Hello, Is wholesaling allowed in Delaware?

B of the article states:"...any plan described in Section 4975(e)(1) of the Code, including individual retirement accounts and Keogh plans; and"Here is what 4975(e)(1) states:(e)Definitions(1)PlanFor purposes of this section, the term “plan” means—(A)a trust described in section 401(a) which forms a part of a plan, or a plan described in section 403(a), which trust or plan is exempt from tax under section 501(a),(B)an individual retirement account described in section 408(a),(C)an individual retirement annuity described in section 408(b),(D)an Archer MSA described in section 220(d),(E)a health savings account described in section 223(d),(F)a Coverdell education savings account described in section 530, or(G)a trust, plan, account, or annuity which, at any time, has been determined by the Secretary to be described in any preceding subparagraph of this paragraph.I am sure there is far more to it than my trivial analysis, but it would be good for everyone to learn if someone could connect the legal dots here.  

We encourage HUD to follow the recommendation of the Federal Agencies and consider a de minimis exception for certain individuals.3 In their draft final rule, the Federal Agencies suggest that an individual who does not regularly or principally function as a loan originator, for example has acted as a loan originator for 5 or fewer residential mortgage loans in the past 12 months, is not subject to the SAFE Act.