Yeesh, that's pretty bold lol.If you do go see a lawyer, I suggest you take the laws and/or links I posted on that other thread with you.  

And from what I can tell of your post, it sounds like you will lean toward being a pushover, so it will benefit you to have a hardliner first impression.I wouldn't sit at a poker table if I were you.Mine in bold.

We plan on painting the whole house, giving it an updated look and I really like grey hues.

If they're bold enough to sue you, let that happen while they live somewhere else.If you present this to a judge, it will be plain as day that this was a scam.  

I appreciate the boldness of confrontation in constructive mannerism.

I like the hue of green and how it pops against the white background.

But I'll put the pertinent info at the top, in the middle, and at the bottom of the ad anyway, in bold. 

@Rob AndersonEDIT to add I tried to UNDERLINE BOLD AND Italicize the line above but since it still does not stand out enough I repeat it here "Metro Detroit has problems yes" 

in my most recent tenant drama, a couple who claimed to be 'husband and wife' and 'childless' turned out to be unmarried, have 3 kids(who were in and out of foster care), along with a whole other slew of mistruths. i'd simply like to know that, given federal (and local) statutes that strictly prohibit discrimination based on family status, is there any recourse in dealing with a situation where a couple presents as husband and wife (and/or as without children) when once approved, they move in and are quite bold about the fact that they actually aren't married and even go as far as to state that nor do ever plan to get married because its 'just a piece of paper'(the latter only with which do i agree) and then nonchalantly march in with an army of undisclosed children they claim are their own?

Wow very bold!