So what's right for one will be terrible for another and vice versa.I'm a conservative investor so do things very differently than someone with a different mind-set.

Tenants aren't squatters and vice versa in Georgia. 

Do you want to have good cash flow, but not too concerned about the appreciation, or vice-versa, do you want a fair combination of both, do you want a property that is desirable and rents easily when vacated (or sells quicker), do you want to be able to sell it at a big profit in 10 years and buy a multi-family throwing off more cash flow or buy 3 other sfr's, etc.

in simple term:the sum amount of money in being circulation is always going to increase the residential real estate valuation as it has limited supply as hard asset and increased demand.rising amount of money is equal to higher inflation, but whether the dollar rising or not it depends on interest rate, whether it's higher againts its peer (if rate is higher then it causes more expensive dollar thus higher USD), and vice versa.in other word, the more inflation it is, the more expensive real estate would be.you can see the same characteristic in other country as well.

I am the listing broker, lender, acquisition GSD'er and team captain ;) and worked with my investor partner to make it happen

What vice versa for higher cap rate properties?

Someone may think a property is "C Class" but you might think it's D-class or vice versa.

Think of yourself as the captain of your own ship, charting the course toward financial freedom and success.

So an investment that's great for one will be terrible to another and vice versa.

I also hate HOAs so I am more inclined to recommend a house vice a condo.