I'm inclined to MFH looking at it from the scalibility point, from the maintenance, mgmt point the ability to acquire more units on 1 transaction and 1 financing.

.- Smaller properties are usually easier to off-load (more liquid) because our society is seeing very high levels of migration (people travelling or moving for work constantly) / people less inclined to partner / have families / people more focused on work / and pied-a-terre concept.- Condos are much easier to maintain internally than larger homes.- Condos are easier to manage as Air B&B than larger homes.- In the case of multi-family properties, sharing a home with two or three other families where everyone knows everyone can create issues if they don't get along as the close proximity doesn't allow for any privacy.Happy to connect with you and speak in more detail if you are interested in Massachusetts!

I love income properties so my first inclination is to keep it.

If you represent a buyer(s) and find a “great” deal you’re inclined to purchase for yourself, are you fulfilling your agency relationship with your buyers if you don’t offer them an opportunity to purchase that property first?  

If it isn’t a local code item then I’d be inclined to not worry.

That's all you are doing with your contemplated entity structure as they will be more inclined to want to see what's hidden leading to an even more thorough and invasive discovery process. 

If so, it could still very much make sense.If this is simply new construction in a low-end area though, that's different.That said, if this area is rapidly improving I'd be much more inclined to buy some of those lower end section 8 houses than I would a new construction project.

I'm inclined to think not.

I'd be more inclined to look at Camden VS Trenton.

(Of course, Airbnb is a flawed "neutral" party, I would argue, as they seem inclined to side with guests over hosts.)