If done well you could then do similar syndication models in many other states where there is a likely similar need/market?

I'm looking at one right now with the following (real, live situation):3.85% commission, 0% annually (unless you go through an RIA, you shouldn't be paying any fees to participate in a DST along the way; but there are operating expenses that are transparently modeled based on the assets in the Trust), disposition fee of 2% (subordinated to a full return of original investor equity outside of monthly distributions).

They have 1 slot open Monday and that if I make a decision today he can replace the unit with a brand new model then (it was a Saturday).

Any thoughts or ideas to make either model work the best (selling on contract or renting)?

Which I used to own a few doors of that management style and I sold those on notes to investors who specialized in that style of rentals. 

I use that number because that would seem to be the bench mark for FI from W2 for many people, with basic life styles.

With this model there's no need to do dozens of deals at a time, in fact, one deal a month can literally be worth 7 figures. 

It can be a great business model, but there's a lot to understand about MTRs because the niche is broad, but there's an art to matching your property type with the right type of guest.

Others have had some luck with Booking.com, but their 100% guest centric model, it can be a problem.

For our market, we've created a model that analyzes EVERY property in Northern Nevada simultaneously, instead of needing to plug in one property at a time.