Hi,My uncle (blood-related) owned a home in southern Massachusetts.

When there's blood on street like now, it's good time to invest *selectively* at public company as their valuation is very bad right now. 

Historical asset appreciation on ranchlands is 4-6% with a wider variance above 6 due to changes in consumer tastes and preferences, as well as crazy post-2020 conditions, but generally and historically if you hold for 10 years you will likely hit 6% CAGR on the ranchland asset.Banks are lending at 6% but P&I is difficult to cash flow for the borrower/operator with operating net margins of 10% (on all capital assets).I understand we are all in a funky time of low cap rates and high interest rates, so in trying to be creative squeezing blood from a stone, is there a demand on the investor side for assuming the risk in order to obtain the appreciation and tax benefits with historically low volatility?

Today I got a bill that is 100% more than what I used to pay - my blood was rushing- They increased my building coverage- They changed from "cash value" to "replacement value"These 2 updates that they made cost my portfolio to go double.

Today I got a bill that is 100% more than what I used to pay - my blood was rushing- They increased my building coverage- They changed from "cash value" to "replacement value"These 2 updates that they made cost my portfolio to go double.

Ok for an old man my blood pressure is high enough for today.

Hello there,I am a newbie to wholesaling and would love to connect and share input with 5-6 Wholesalers in the Rochester market who are true blooded Real Estate Entrepreneurs.All stages of wisdom would be a great network for me so please, let's connect! 

Today I got a bill that is 100% more than what I used to pay - my blood was rushing- They increased my building coverage- They changed from "cash value" to "replacement value"These 2 updates that they made cost my portfolio to go double.

I don't wan't everyone to rehash the topic here as it seems to stir everyones blood.

As long as 1 co owner on the mortgage lives in the home its not against FHA rules"Borrowers are eligible for maximum FHA loan financing for non-occupying borrower situations for FHA loan applicants who are related by blood, marriage, or law.