
24 May 2007 | 11 replies
wakefield,I'm still waiting for my attorney to give me a final opinion on the full impact of the legislation, but the section that troubles me (and most lenders I've spoken to) is the section that requires the buyer to "comply with all terms and conditions of the seller's mortgage."

26 July 2007 | 3 replies
And I would be very leery of someone who guarantees the thing will sell... unless of course THEY will buy it if no one else wants to. I

31 May 2007 | 4 replies
Very interesting, Great way to drum up rehab money as well to I suppose if you had too...Thank you so much....By the way, do you ask the lending institution for the 2nd or is it on them to bring it in to close a deal?

2 June 2007 | 6 replies
I guess I do not have to, I just thought it was weird to have so many different companies.

25 June 2007 | 8 replies
From what I have read, the true calculation to stick to is MAO = 70% ARV - rehab, closing costs, holding costs, etc.

18 June 2007 | 17 replies
Not really...The whole idea with subject to is that you take over the payments on someone elses mortgage.

21 June 2007 | 3 replies
It looks like someone wanted to start repairs, but decided not to. I

15 May 2016 | 12 replies
Someone with bad credit might seem like a nice person, but in most cases they have ripped-off someone that they owed money to. I

30 July 2007 | 20 replies
This I can do myself if I wanted to. I