These are two double edge swords.While local gov. likes elevated Property tax because it's income from them, HOWEVER, the Fed prefer the price to be controlled indirectly (aka to go down).So you have local gov. that may want price to go up but Fed that wanna mortgage to stays elevated.Reason is becoz if mortgage is higher than they can meet their inflation target of 2%.

This development is less aggressive than market expectations but still marks a change in direction from prior Fed communications.Market Reactions and Wall Street's Expectations:Following the Fed's announcement, the Dow Jones surged past the 37,000 mark, reflecting the market's response to the rate decision.

Your proposal to combine personal funds which are disqualified to your plan with plan funds and debt is very risky.IRS rules state that there may be no direct or indirect transactions or provision of benefit between a plan and a disqualified person.  

I am planning to go in person to Topeka soon and will be meeting up with people in direct correlation with my plans for rental purchasing. 

@Ron Read,All transactions involving your IRA must be at "arm's length," - meaning no disqualified person is involved, directly or indirectly. 

But the bigger issue here is the indirect effect of these unprecented low rates on the values of all financial assets, real estate being probably the asset type most out of whack during this cycle compared to historical norms.

I feel it is performative, because -they waited till now (which is when they should be giving 30 days' notice to hosts) to file this suit which essentially gives them some time to announce to hosts (on Tuesday) thereby decreasing the amount of time of dealing with the pushback)- they are going after privacy and complication (which can be resolved without reversing the law-they were VERY active during the comment period and got changes like a safe harbor to cover themselves added to the final law-they have been radio silent with NYC hosts directly and indirectly  about precise questions regarding dates and what happens to bookings already in placeThere might be a delay to enforcement, but a delay is still a loss (and potentially more significant liability for hosts)Again, the enforcement is multi-vectored. 

Gents - Forgive me, but since we're all Brooklyn Property Owners / Managers here, may I (also) draw your attention to this indirectly related but pertinent thread?

A "relationship" will not help with residential loans (4 units or less) typically because they could indirectly discriminate and violate a fair housing lending law. 

If they really are using your land to increase the density and value of an adjacent development (even indirectly), you have a very strong argument that your parcel should be allowed that similar increased density and value as well.Unless there is a blatant reason why your property should remain under its current zoning, I would pursue the negotiations with the higher density/value in mind.