or some other loophole.

Per two books that gave some good examples of business structures: one is Robert Kiyosaki's 'Real Book of Realestate'  and the other is a "Rich Dad Poor Dad: Real Estate tax loop holes" book.

The loophole though is you can do it for lease violations and holdover is a pass for that in many areas. 

@Tyler Stiller is right it works I know several people that have done this especially if both spouses are on a mortgage “you have trouble” one buys one in there name one year another in there name the next.. call it what you wish it’s a loophole that not exploited a lot for using 5% down.. you just have to remember with the debt to income ratio changes it get way harder to get more as your mortgage payments are wayyy higher and using 5% down typically you have to go thru traditional methods but the point is @Tyler Stiller isn’t wrong 

Full of loopholes and avenues to charge landlord with extra money.

That being said, I have also been informed that if I, as the single member, am managing said LLC from CA I will have to pay the $800 to CA anyways to register my LLC with the state.My question is, Are there any loopholes to this?

@Rachel AndersonEven if you don't qualify for REPS or the STR loophole, there can be other benefits based on the cash flow and exit plan on the property! 

Showing up late, if at all, doing crappy work, scaring tenants, etc.3) Many loop holes in coverage.

(BTW, there's likely a hardship loophole where you intended to live in it for a year, but after attempting to live alone you realized it wasn't feasible.

I am trying to see if anybody knows a loophole that I could possibly use to technically get the property out of my name so I can use the NACA program.