I haven't seen any, but understand some attorney's now are threatening pretty nice suits for falsely filed memos clouding title. 

He was threatening to "blast" us if we didnt cash them out of the deal or pay them more money to extend their lending period, which isn't stated anywhere in the contract, neither are terms for if they want to be cashed out of the deal.

If it wasn't a nonpaying tenant, it was an angry one, or one threatening to sue me, or a neighbor claiming my property was damaging his!

They are coming and hounding me about twice per day, while I am there working and now threatening law suites, etc. 

If I had a nickel for each time I was threatened like that, well I'd have a heck of a nice stack of nickels, lol.

That's only 45 bps for 30 days, rarely is it this cheap. 2) If you have time to move somewhere else, you can A) go to another broker and get other non-QM quotes and threaten to leave the current broker if they do not give you a free extension/come down in pricing as rates have improved, or B) Tell current broker to get other quotes from other non-QM lenders they work with.

The literature also indicates that if the ESA directly threatens the health or well being of anyone on the premises than it can be denied as well, yet I have also read that allergies are not considered a "direct threat to health"... but it doesn't mention if the allergy induces asthmatic episodes.

The literature also indicates that if the ESA directly threatens the health or well being of anyone on the premises than it can be denied as well, yet I have also read that allergies are not considered a "direct threat to health"... but it doesn't mention if the allergy induces asthmatic episodes.

The literature also indicates that if the ESA directly threatens the health or well being of anyone on the premises than it can be denied as well, yet I have also read that allergies are not considered a "direct threat to health"... but it doesn't mention if the allergy induces asthmatic episodes.

In addition, the owner of the home must not own more than three single-family homes.3) They are unable to provide sufficient documentation, such as the emotional support animal letter, that verifies the ESA is necessary for their health and well-being.4) The tenant provides fraudulent documentation attesting to their need for an emotional support animal (usually a fake emotional support animal letter).5) The landlord can demonstrate that making accommodations for an ESA would impose undue financial burden or logistical burden. 6) The animal is destructive to the property or displays threatening behaviors that could put other tenants or yourself at risk.7) The size or nature of the animal makes it impossible to house safely or humanely.