In Oregon the buyers deposit is generally fully refundable during the standard 10 business day contingency period (unless waived) and the difference in deposit could be interpreted as the level of commitment the buyer has towards the transaction, within reason.

But it certainly seems like it is open to interpretation.  

Haha this is why this situation is so confusing - many people with differing interpretations!

The case law gets interpreted by the lawyers and judges in opposing ways.

That means they all go together, and should all be interpreted with reference to each other. 

Good to know this exists.I wonder if the IRS has issued any guidance on the 7 day rule excepting STR's from the definition of "rental activity"  or on how "material participation" is going to be interpreted in this context?   

The below is simply our interpretation of some aspects of HB24-1098.

So, am I accurate in interpreting your bottom line there as this is more of a fee for a class/coaching than it is in actual tax strategy?

Mark NolanCan 408(b)(2) be interpreted as I can use the plan to fund the unit "if the unit is used to conduct reasonable services or business necessary for the operation or the establishment?" 

We are planning to transfer it to a land trust, yes.When you transfer a contract that has a due on sale clause, to a Land Trust, to hide the transfer, (that is the reason for the Land Trust, now isn't it) just be aware that is interpreted by the court as the intent to deceive.