29 December 2020 | 119 replies
They basically learned all their systems, fundamentals, and etc then went off on their own.

3 August 2020 | 10 replies
They have fundamentals to justify the valuations although they are getting stretched a bit.

3 August 2020 | 3 replies
This isn't like putting a man on the moon, this is a fundamental skill.

6 August 2020 | 3 replies
@Prameela Alla, welcome to BiggerPockets and congratulations on starting with the fundamentals of deal analysis!

12 August 2020 | 12 replies
This is not a fear based trend or even market fundamental down turn.

9 August 2020 | 8 replies
The pricing typically has almost no correlation to the underlying asset fundamentals.
7 August 2020 | 1 reply
Start early and focus on the fundamentals!

13 August 2020 | 7 replies
While it's generally one step up the capital structure from rents and mortgage payments, they aren't seeing mass non-performance either:This top-line performance is supported by strong fundamentals, with a number of our stabilized properties actually experiencing positive rent growth in spite of the larger economic contraction.We attribute this success primarily to having maintained a disciplined value investment approach, led by our most active strategy of owning and lending to affordable apartment communities in growing cities throughout the Sunbelt.

11 January 2021 | 20 replies
Lets dive into a few of the take-aways from our PVRP_RESIDENTIAL: Residential 1: $350,000 single family home with no debtMarket rents for properties like this are around $1800Operating expenses are relatively low, tenants pay utilities and i’ve a assume a owner/manager situation for all three scenariosNo debt, means no principle pay down, higher cashflow in dollars, lower After-tax cashflow return due to taxesProjected year 1 returns would be as follows for this illustration:Pre-tax Cashflow $13,070 (3.73%), Pre-tax + Pay Down $13,070 (3.74%), After-tax + Pay Down $12,749 (3.64%) and Total Return $22,551 (6.44%)Residential 2: $350,000 single family home with low leverage (50% Loan-to-value)Leave market rent and operating expense variables the same to maintain a like-kind analysisYou could theoretically buy two of these, so for illustration purposes multiply each return metric by 2Projected year 1 returns would be as follows:Pre-tax Cashflow $3,640 (2.08%), Pre-tax + Pay Down $6,999 (4.00%), After-tax + Pay Down $7,224 (4.13%) and Total Return $17,026 (9.73%)Residential 3: $350,000 single family home with moderate leverage (70% Loan-to-value)Again rent and expenses are fixedYou could theoretically buy 3 of these with your available capitalProjected year 1 returns would be as follows: Pre-tax cashflow -$132 (-0.13%), Pre-tax Cashflow + Pay Down $4,570 (4.35%), After-tax + Pay Down $5,014 (4.77%) and Total Return $14,816 (14.11%)The take away here are the fundamentals of leverage.Sheet 2, named PVRP_MULTIFAMILY will outline some current on-market opportunities.

12 August 2020 | 2 replies
When I have been in this situation as a seller or listing agent I have met it with a "umm . . . hard pass" each time because it fundamentally changes the terms of the offer.