
13 March 2016 | 7 replies
Speculators buy without a positive return relying on historic appreciation records to support their gamble.

11 August 2015 | 46 replies
The difference between 2005 and now, is that back in 2005 deals were bought at a massive negative amortization, as you stated and they were purchased solely as a gamble for appreciation.

18 January 2016 | 13 replies
It is more how I would suggest you invest based on what you said about risk earlier.I get bored easy and like to gamble.

7 February 2019 | 10 replies
Roofstock is really interesting and I love the concept, the only problem I have with their site is much of their stock seems like it can be a gamble.

31 October 2017 | 13 replies
You will be relieved once you add this.As far as fresh water, or hot water plumbing other than leaving faucets on low drip in really cold weather it's a gamble..

13 February 2018 | 4 replies
Plus investing so much and not knowing the result, for me that's gambling your hard earned money.

30 March 2018 | 69 replies
I am not aware of the Santa Clarita option as that is not in LA city of borders...county yes but don't know if those non city areas were part of the LA city proposals or not.

21 October 2015 | 70 replies
They too could have just kept using the land but they wanted to control it.If it were me I'd be looking to see if I could profit on a resale to a bordering property, regardless of zoning.