Your verbiage actually makes it a grey area open for interpretation for a judge in your instance. 

I stumbled on this website from the city of Scottsdale yesterday. https://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/codes/vacation-short-term-rentalsI may be interpreting this incorrectly but it seems like the first condition is saying that all units on the property must be offered for rent.

I just wasted about a month of time working with a CPA whom I will not be utilizing for my tax prep now.For those who are familiar with MSRRA, Military Spouse Act -  Residency Relief...How is it being interpreted?

Tenant shall be liable for damages to Landlord for all loss sustained, including, without limitation, the balance of the Rent and Additional Rent due for the remainder of the Term, court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees;To me I interpret that as, I am going to retain and use your security deposit towards what loss is sustained  as far as money owed to me for her not completing the lease and signed contract.  

With it not being well defined under Reg D, I think it creates opportunity for interpretation and potential trouble for those who interpret it the wrong way.

I’m no expert, I just listen to what other do and interpret to my market .

I know this is an interpretation of the meaning of CoCR, but I think it's valid because of the goal of the CoCR analysis.

And the problem is that when you do a 1031 they interpret the first dollar you touch or the amount you buy less than you sell as profit. 

And the interpretation of the law in that jurisdiction.

I'm in the early learning stage and one of the things I'm getting stuck on is the interpretation of certain sales transactions for a property.