I believe so.

I believe that is the fastest way and easiest way to get a judgment too, correct?

Is it wrong to believe that the NAR Settlement is evil for sellers who want their real estate agents to get the maximum value for properties they flip?

I am not sure the vacancy rate of the area of his units, but at his price point I believe he has experience in rough areas.  

I’ve always believed that if the lender is a “partner” sharing exposure and not an at cost money provider dividing the profit of the deal into three sections is appropriate   MoneyMarketingManagement This said it’s not unreasonable to allow a minimum return after “X” profit.  

Several of the masonry contractors said they can’t believe the city gets away with this because it's a known issue that these materials don't mix and it will eventually cause problems like water intrusion that can be very costly for the owner to fix.

TO ANY OUT OF STATE INVESTOR STAY FAR AWAY FROM THE CITY OF CLEVELAND IF YOU DO NOT BELIEVE ME JUST GOOGLE AND READ THE NEWS OR CALL A REAL ESTATE ATTORNEY THAT WORKS IN CLEVELAND AND CONSULT THEM BEFORE PURCHASING PROPERTY.This is helpful for anyone thinking of investing in Cleveland market.  

I found all sorts of things to reference for an eviction including excessive damage to the property, signs of an animal, lack of yard maintenance, oil spill on driveway, smoke detectors removed, the unit smelled of smoke, appliances that came with the unit moved off site ect... 

I dislike LL that do cash for keys and believe they are doing all other LL a disservice.  

You are correct it’s a state by state thing but most states it is allowed - it also matters if it’s a primary or investmentFor example I believe Arizona you cannot get a deficiency after sale on Owner occupied but can on investment and in Texas I don’t believe you can attach to the home.Btw this is not something I typically do - but if the borrower is not going to play ball, then that’s different